S&P reviews alternative strategies
Strong market demand for specialist strategies has led Standard & Poor’s(S&P) to review funds offering exposure outside of more traditional varieties as part of a standalone peer group.
Included in the review were single manager hedge funds, income funds, tactical allocators and multi-strategy funds.
S&P found that the highly anticipated growth of multi-strategy funds had not materialised and that the funds on offer in this sub-peer group suffer from positioning and cost/reward ratio problems.
In terms of the tactical sub-peer group, quantitative funds experienced poor performance, but their fundamental/technical counterparts delivered much better results.
S&P said further breadth of strategies and the incorporation of shorter-term momentum-style indicators would help the quantitative-style funds in the tactical sub-peer group to adapt to changing market conditions.
S&P scored single-strategy hedge fund managers well, but pointed out the high fee levels, and also gave income funds a positive review, especially the more established managers that combine strong stock picking skills with derivatives experience.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
