Sonray director faces 24 criminal charges
The director of collapsed brokerage firm Sonray Capital Markets, Russell Johnson, has appeared in Melbourne Magistrates Court after his arrest on 24 criminal charges following an investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Johnson, of Toorak Victoria, was charged with two charges to commit theft to the value of $5.78 million, two charges of conspiracy to engage in false accounting, one charge of conspiracy to obtain financial advantage by deception, 17 charges of theft to the value of $742,641, and two charges of submitting a false document to ASIC.
If convicted, he would face a maximum of ten years' imprisonment on each of the state offences.
Johnson was granted bail on the condition that he surrender his passport and not attend any international point of departure.
The proceedings against Johnson follow the February arrest of Sonray chief executive, Scott Murray.
Murray, who is Johnson's brother-in-law, pleaded guilty to 10 criminal charges involving fake deposits, making false withdrawals and theft.
Sonray, established in 2003, was one of the first brokers to provide advice on contracts for difference. In June last year, John Lindholm and George Georges of Ferrier Hodgson - a turnaround, reconstruction and forensics company - were appointed voluntary administrators, and in October 2010 Sonray was placed into liquidation.
According to the liquidators, as at June 2010 Sonray had gross client positions of $76.85m, gross client holdings in either cash/equities held by counterparties of $30.15m, a shortfall of $46.7m, approximately 3,500 clients and 54 employees.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
