Someone watching the watchers
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) may be one of the nation’s best resourced and best funded regulators, but it has been subject to less recent parliamentary scrutiny than the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), according to new research released by the Rule of Law Association of Australia.
The research, released late last week, examined the level of scrutiny directed at Commonwealth regulators by the Parliament, including the number of questions each regulator was asked, whether they made opening statements to Parliamentary committees and how quickly they responded to questions on notice.
The research found that while ASIC had more than twice the budget of the ACCC and chose to make opening statements to committees where the competition regulator did not, ASIC received less than half the time before committees compared to the ACCC and “often barely more time than APRA, which has one-third of ASIC’s budget”.
The Rule of Law Association analysis said the time squeeze experienced by ASIC might explain why it took a larger number of questions on notice.
The survey noted that ASIC took the most questions on notice of any of the regulators and added that with the exception of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, most of the regulators waited until after the due date to reply to those questions.
The survey provided as an example a due date for answers of 31 July last year, with ASIC providing answers on 18 August, 9 September and 21 October.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
