SMSFs not that rewarding for planners

financial planning SMSFs research and ratings financial planners investment trends commonwealth bank trustee

1 November 2012
| By Milana Pokrajac |
image
image
expand image

The long-anticipated rise in revenue coming from the self-managed super fund (SMSF) client base is not happening just yet for financial planners, according to new research by Investment Trends.

According to the Investment Trends Self Managed Super Funds: Planner Report, the surveyed advisers derived 21 per cent of their revenue from SMSF clients, despite their rough estimates from three years ago being much higher at 33 per cent.

"Advisers have been anticipating an increase in the role SMSFs play within their businesses for a number of years, but this has not materialised for some," said senior investment analyst Recep Peker.

In fact, Peker said, the crucial SMSF market has proved to be a challenge for financial planners, with many losing ground and deriving a lower proportion of their overall revenue from this client segment.

Only a quarter of the 589 surveyed planners were regarded as SMSF specialists, servicing 20 or more clients in this space.

Peker said non-specialist planners were struggling with the administration challenges, client education about trustee responsibilities, and competition from accountants.

"What are specialists doing differently? Specialists are more likely to have relationships with several accounting firms for referrals," Peker said. "By adopting a more defensive/income oriented investment approach, they are more in tune with their clients' investment needs, and they are more involved in clients' share-trading activities."

SMSFs are the fastest-growing segment of the superannuation industry and the market of choice for planners to tap into.

Even large financial services institutions have been making their move into this space, with AMP acquiring SMSF administrator Cavendish, and the Commonwealth Bank acquiring Count Financial.

"We are also still experiencing significant pressure on fees," said Peker. "Planners are responding to these cost pressures, and have cut ongoing SMSF fees by 5 per cent since the last study to $3,800 per annum."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS