Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

SMSFs fine without advisers, study finds

smsf-professionals/SMSF/retirement/financial-advisers/accounting/SPAA/smsf-trustees/SMSFs/cent/chief-executive/advisers/

28 November 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Research commissioned by Vanguard and the SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) has exposed the failure of advisers to improve the financial strength of self-managed super fund (SMSF) members' account balances. 

A Rice Warner survey of SPAA and Vanguard trustees could not identify a clear relationship between the use of financial advice and the performance of their SMSF, with unhappy trustees accusing advisers of having less knowledge of complex SMSF issues than the SMSF members themselves. 

According to the survey, the average performance for SMSFs was the same - at 11.1 or 11.2 per cent - regardless of whether SMSF trustees relied on advisers, accountants or researching newspapers and books for their information.

Forty-three per cent of respondents use a planner for their main source of financial information, while just over 40 per cent rely on financial newspapers, magazines or books.

The research found 31.5 per cent use the internet and nearly 52 per cent of respondents use accountants or tax specialists.

Members also accused advisers are being more interested in product pushing than client returns, or cited the lack of adviser contact as a concern.

Rice Warner chief executive Michael Rice agreed that one reason for the lack of correlation between SMSF returns and advice was that people were relying on their own education rather than an expert, but added that investors also had assets outside super, and an SMSF only comprised one part of a portfolio.

Sixty-six per cent of respondents said their adviser met their expectations, while 34 per cent were unsatisfied with the advice received.

Rice cautioned that the issue needed to be looked at again in future.

SPAA chief executive Andrea Slattery said that SMSF investors weren't necessarily seeking complex advice every time they saw a planner, but a holistic flexible strategy, including compliance and improving investors' education.

The research also found unrealistic expectations of income needs, with 27 per cent of respondents believing they would have more than $100,000 of annual income in retirement.

It was unrealistic if you considered that members lived for 30 to 40 years after retirement, Rice said.  

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

5 days 6 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks 2 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND