SMSF Association calls for clarity about advisers’ prior education
The SMSF Association is urging the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) to provide more guidance and certainty around how recognised prior learning for existing financial advisers will be implemented as they transition to the new education standards.
SMSF Association head of policy Jordan George said introducing higher education standards for financial advisers has always been a key policy goal for the organisation, but it was essential that advisers have greater clarity and certainty as to how their existing qualifications will count under the new education standards being proposed by FASEA.
In its submission to FASEA “on proposed guidance on education pathways for existing advisers”, the association said advisers who have made every effort to be educated and have completed high-quality education and accreditations should have their efforts to be professional recognised under the FASEA framework.
“Currently, the proposed FASEA education standards for existing advisers do not provide enough recognition for prior learning,” George said.
“A more meaningful recognition of advisers’ prior education should help them in the transition to the new regime with less cost and effort while maintaining the high standards that must be achieved to ensure consumer trust.”
George said the SMSF Association also strongly recommended in its submission that financial advisers who service SMSF trustees should be required to have completed specialised SMSF education.
“We also recommended greater flexibility for new entrants to undertake university study and still be able to enter the financial advice profession. The proposed FASEA pathway for new entrants is too rigid and may starve the industry of future advisers,” he said.
George said the association also raised concerns about accountants giving SMSF advice under a limited license not being adequately considered under the existing pathways framework.
“We are advocating a specific pathway designed for the services they provide rather than having them spend considerable time and money studying subjects that are not relevant to the advice they provide,” he said.
Recommended for you
Compared to four years ago when the divide between boutique and large licensees were largely equal, adviser movements have seen this trend shift in light of new licensees commencing.
As ongoing market uncertainty sees advisers look beyond traditional equity exposure, Fidante has found adviser interest in small caps and emerging markets for portfolio returns has almost doubled since April.
CoreData has shared the top areas of demand for cryptocurrency advice but finds investors are seeking advisers who actively invest in the asset themselves.
With regulators ‘raising the bar’ on retirement planning, Lonsec Research and Ratings has urged advisers to place greater focus on sequencing and longevity risk as they navigate clients through the shifting landscape.
