SMSF Association calls for clarity about advisers’ prior education
The SMSF Association is urging the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) to provide more guidance and certainty around how recognised prior learning for existing financial advisers will be implemented as they transition to the new education standards.
SMSF Association head of policy Jordan George said introducing higher education standards for financial advisers has always been a key policy goal for the organisation, but it was essential that advisers have greater clarity and certainty as to how their existing qualifications will count under the new education standards being proposed by FASEA.
In its submission to FASEA “on proposed guidance on education pathways for existing advisers”, the association said advisers who have made every effort to be educated and have completed high-quality education and accreditations should have their efforts to be professional recognised under the FASEA framework.
“Currently, the proposed FASEA education standards for existing advisers do not provide enough recognition for prior learning,” George said.
“A more meaningful recognition of advisers’ prior education should help them in the transition to the new regime with less cost and effort while maintaining the high standards that must be achieved to ensure consumer trust.”
George said the SMSF Association also strongly recommended in its submission that financial advisers who service SMSF trustees should be required to have completed specialised SMSF education.
“We also recommended greater flexibility for new entrants to undertake university study and still be able to enter the financial advice profession. The proposed FASEA pathway for new entrants is too rigid and may starve the industry of future advisers,” he said.
George said the association also raised concerns about accountants giving SMSF advice under a limited license not being adequately considered under the existing pathways framework.
“We are advocating a specific pathway designed for the services they provide rather than having them spend considerable time and money studying subjects that are not relevant to the advice they provide,” he said.
Recommended for you
A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rules.
Insignia Financial has experienced total quarterly net outflows of $1.8 billion as a result of client rebalancing, while its multi-asset flows halved from the prior quarter.
Prime Financial is looking to shed its “sleeping giant” reputation with larger M&A transactions going forward, having agreed to acquire research firm Lincoln Indicators.
An affiliate of Pinnacle Investment Management has expanded its reach with a London office as the fund manager seeks to grow its overseas distribution into the UK and Europe.
