SMSF Association calls for clarity about advisers’ prior education

FASEA smsf association SMSF education standards

17 July 2018
| By Nicholas Grove |
image
image
expand image

The SMSF Association is urging the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) to provide more guidance and certainty around how recognised prior learning for existing financial advisers will be implemented as they transition to the new education standards.

SMSF Association head of policy Jordan George said introducing higher education standards for financial advisers has always been a key policy goal for the organisation, but it was essential that advisers have greater clarity and certainty as to how their existing qualifications will count under the new education standards being proposed by FASEA.

In its submission to FASEA “on proposed guidance on education pathways for existing advisers”, the association said advisers who have made every effort to be educated and have completed high-quality education and accreditations should have their efforts to be professional recognised under the FASEA framework.

“Currently, the proposed FASEA education standards for existing advisers do not provide enough recognition for prior learning,” George said.

“A more meaningful recognition of advisers’ prior education should help them in the transition to the new regime with less cost and effort while maintaining the high standards that must be achieved to ensure consumer trust.”

George said the SMSF Association also strongly recommended in its submission that financial advisers who service SMSF trustees should be required to have completed specialised SMSF education.

“We also recommended greater flexibility for new entrants to undertake university study and still be able to enter the financial advice profession. The proposed FASEA pathway for new entrants is too rigid and may starve the industry of future advisers,” he said.

George said the association also raised concerns about accountants giving SMSF advice under a limited license not being adequately considered under the existing pathways framework.

“We are advocating a specific pathway designed for the services they provide rather than having them spend considerable time and money studying subjects that are not relevant to the advice they provide,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

6 days 4 hours ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

3 days 21 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS