SMSF Association calls for clarity about advisers’ prior education

FASEA/smsf-association/SMSF/education-standards/

17 July 2018
| By Nicholas Grove |
image
image image
expand image

The SMSF Association is urging the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) to provide more guidance and certainty around how recognised prior learning for existing financial advisers will be implemented as they transition to the new education standards.

SMSF Association head of policy Jordan George said introducing higher education standards for financial advisers has always been a key policy goal for the organisation, but it was essential that advisers have greater clarity and certainty as to how their existing qualifications will count under the new education standards being proposed by FASEA.

In its submission to FASEA “on proposed guidance on education pathways for existing advisers”, the association said advisers who have made every effort to be educated and have completed high-quality education and accreditations should have their efforts to be professional recognised under the FASEA framework.

“Currently, the proposed FASEA education standards for existing advisers do not provide enough recognition for prior learning,” George said.

“A more meaningful recognition of advisers’ prior education should help them in the transition to the new regime with less cost and effort while maintaining the high standards that must be achieved to ensure consumer trust.”

George said the SMSF Association also strongly recommended in its submission that financial advisers who service SMSF trustees should be required to have completed specialised SMSF education.

“We also recommended greater flexibility for new entrants to undertake university study and still be able to enter the financial advice profession. The proposed FASEA pathway for new entrants is too rigid and may starve the industry of future advisers,” he said.

George said the association also raised concerns about accountants giving SMSF advice under a limited license not being adequately considered under the existing pathways framework.

“We are advocating a specific pathway designed for the services they provide rather than having them spend considerable time and money studying subjects that are not relevant to the advice they provide,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

3 months ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 months 4 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

4 months ago

AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity. ...

1 day 5 hours ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

3 weeks ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest financial adviser exam, held in November 2025....

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo