Sluggish start to new year
It has been a sluggish start to the new year for Australia’s fund managers, accord-ing to the latest InTech Financial Services market survey.
It has been a sluggish start to the new year for Australia’s fund managers, accord-ing to the latest InTech Financial Services market survey.
Most Australian equities managers failed to match the performance of the bench-mark All Ordinaries index which in itself lost ground on its December highs.
In particular, value stocks have copped a hammering. During January, Australian value stocks declined by 5.6 per cent. In comparison, Australian growth stocks re-turned 0.9 per cent. For the year to January, Australian value stocks returned 7.6 per cent, compared with the 12.9 per cent returns enjoyed by growth stocks.
Across the board, Australian share managers posted a loss of 2.4 per cent for Janu-ary while the All Ordinaries Accumulation Index fell during the same period by 1.8 per cent, mainly in response to increasing interest rates.
Among the stronger performers for January were HSBC High Alpha (-0.4 per cent), County ACE (-0.5 per cent) and, interestingly enough, value managers Tyn-dall (-0.6 per cent).
International managers didn’t fare much better, with international share markets down 3.3 per cent in Australian dollar terms in January. Despite the fall in overall value, Dresdner managed a positive return (1.5 per cent) for the start of 2000, fol-lowed by INVESCO (0.6 per cent) and Colonial First State (-0.6 per cent).
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
