Size does matter, but it’s not everything

fund manager fund managers platforms financial services association

17 February 2003
| By Lucie Beaman |

Firms are prepared to pay up to three times more than the usual price for a fund manager with significant funds under management (FUM), according to the latest analysis fromPricewaterhouseCoopers(PWC).

The report suggests that purchasers of funds management businesses are prepared to pay significantly higher prices for larger operations. Since 1998 the premium deals have been made with managers with more than $10 billion in FUM, attracting sales prices of between 10-18 per cent of FUM.

In the past four years, none of the fund managers with less than $5 billion in FUM have attracted this premium for price, generally going instead for prices between 1-6 per cent of that amount.

The trend that emerges with this information is that acquirers are using consistent growth rates to value businesses, which could be a danger if the numerous post-acquisition risks are not taken into account.

While theInvestment and Financial Services Association’s survey of industry statistics sees the scale of operations as the most important factor for fund managers in improving efficiency, there is not always a clear link between the size of a fund manager and their earnings rate.

PWC flag key manager risk, improving efficiency and the earnings rate on FUM, sustaining the value of a previously independent brand, and investment performance as the real challenges in determining the success or failure of an acquisition.

Other factors which determine price include access to distribution, funds under advice, and wrap or master funds platforms; as well as manger efficiency. A strong brand/reputation, technology, ownership of customers and access to niche markets also work in favour of the selling manager.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 19 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 23 hours ago