Shorten not convinced of negative opt-in impact

financial planners commissions insurance FOFA financial planning association of financial advisers financial planning practices financial planning industry AFA treasury financial advisers government

28 June 2011
| By Milana Pokrajac |
image
image
expand image

Financial Services Minister Bill Shorten (pictured) has told financial planners they haven’t managed to convince him the introduction of a two-year opt-in requirement would “beat their businesses to a pulp”.

Addressing financial planners at an Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) luncheon in Sydney, Shorten acknowledged he had seen evidence suggesting the introduction of opt-in would lead to a significant cost increases to the provision of advice, but said he did not believe the figures.

Treasury was convinced, however, that an annual opt-in requirement would be too onerous, hence the new two-year proposal, the minister said.

“I do not accept the proposition that asking clients to renew mandates every two years is beating financial planners to a pulp; I don’t get that and I haven’t been persuaded by any of your advocates on that point,” Shorten said.

“I believe that a large number of financial planning practices seek mandates from their customers more frequently than on a two-year basis,” he added.

Instead, the minister invited financial planners and their associations to work with Treasury to develop the scope of the opt-in requirement.

He did understand concerns of those looking to sell their practices, with opt-in uncertainty preventing them from guaranteeing four or five times annual income.

He responded in a similar fashion to planners’ concerns about the commissions ban on risk products within super, expressing scepticism that its introduction would lead to further underinsurance, and referred to figures which suggested there had been an uptake in insurance via super.

“What I don't accept is that financial planning should not upgrade its performance in terms of eliminating conflicted remuneration structures; I don't accept the proposition that compulsory superannuation should be taxed by all those financial service providers on the way through to someone’s retirement,” Shorten added.

However, the AFA said it did not change its views on the two most controversial Future of Financial Advice proposals, with its political strategist Kerry Chikarovski warning the Government that planners would continue to work with the Opposition to block the reforms package.

The financial planning industry would most probably see the draft legislation in August, according to Shorten.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 month 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 months 1 week ago

ASIC has taken action against a Queensland adviser who was sentenced last May for misappropriating $1.8 million from his clients....

1 month ago

AMP is to launch a digital advice service to provide retirement advice to members of its AMP Super Fund, in partnership with Bravura Solutions. ...

1 month ago

A former Insignia Financial C-suite exec has taken on a leadership role at MUFG Retirement Solutions as it announces chief executive Dee McGrath will depart after six yea...

1 month ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS