Shorten not convinced of negative opt-in impact

financial planners commissions insurance FOFA financial planning association of financial advisers financial planning practices financial planning industry AFA treasury financial advisers government

28 June 2011
| By Milana Pokrajac |
image
image
expand image

Financial Services Minister Bill Shorten (pictured) has told financial planners they haven’t managed to convince him the introduction of a two-year opt-in requirement would “beat their businesses to a pulp”.

Addressing financial planners at an Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) luncheon in Sydney, Shorten acknowledged he had seen evidence suggesting the introduction of opt-in would lead to a significant cost increases to the provision of advice, but said he did not believe the figures.

Treasury was convinced, however, that an annual opt-in requirement would be too onerous, hence the new two-year proposal, the minister said.

“I do not accept the proposition that asking clients to renew mandates every two years is beating financial planners to a pulp; I don’t get that and I haven’t been persuaded by any of your advocates on that point,” Shorten said.

“I believe that a large number of financial planning practices seek mandates from their customers more frequently than on a two-year basis,” he added.

Instead, the minister invited financial planners and their associations to work with Treasury to develop the scope of the opt-in requirement.

He did understand concerns of those looking to sell their practices, with opt-in uncertainty preventing them from guaranteeing four or five times annual income.

He responded in a similar fashion to planners’ concerns about the commissions ban on risk products within super, expressing scepticism that its introduction would lead to further underinsurance, and referred to figures which suggested there had been an uptake in insurance via super.

“What I don't accept is that financial planning should not upgrade its performance in terms of eliminating conflicted remuneration structures; I don't accept the proposition that compulsory superannuation should be taxed by all those financial service providers on the way through to someone’s retirement,” Shorten added.

However, the AFA said it did not change its views on the two most controversial Future of Financial Advice proposals, with its political strategist Kerry Chikarovski warning the Government that planners would continue to work with the Opposition to block the reforms package.

The financial planning industry would most probably see the draft legislation in August, according to Shorten.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 4 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS