Shock, horror planners not guilty
Financial planners have actually managed to surprise the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) by refusing to take lucrative commissions from property spruikers.
Evidence given by a senior ASIC officer to Senate Estimates yesterday revealed the manner in which planners had actually adopted the high moral ground where residential property spruiking was concerned and had declined to take commissions and, in doing so, had proved adverse media reports to be wrong.
Answering questions from Tasmanian Greens Senator, Peter Whish-Wilson, ASIC senior executive, Joanna Bird, referenced what she described as "a whole spate" of allegations in newspapers about two years' ago involving financial planners taking commissions to recommend residential property.
"We followed them all up and there was nothing happening," she said. "In fact, it was one of those circumstances where the outcome was quite pleasing — commissions were being offered to financial advisers and when we approached the people who were offering them they did not actually manage to find anyone who would take them."
Senator Whish-Wilson had asked whether, if he went to a financial planner, or a financial adviser, and they recommended that he invested in an off-plan development because the planner was being offered a 15 per cent commission, it would be viewed as conflicted remuneration under the Future of Financial Advice legislation.
Bird said it would depend on the circumstances and that it might prove a stretch because real estate was not regarded as a financial product.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
