Shift to institutions diminishes adviser value

united states dealer group financial planning financial services licence financial advice FOFA australian financial services

27 November 2013
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

Non-aligned financial planners who joined institutions in the lead-up to the introduction of recent reforms made value-destroying choices and would regret the decision, according to the head of a boutique planning practice. 

Treysta head of wealth management Mark Nagle said the recent introduction of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms was an opportunity to move their business forward that many practices had missed. 

“Prior to FOFA Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) applications dropped off as some planners moved into institutions while some stood on the sidelines waiting to see what would take place,” Nagle said. 

“AFSL applications have returned to normal levels as those who stood on the sidelines have discovered they can work in the new regulatory environment and even compete in it with larger players.” 

Nagle, who with Treysta is seeking to move out from under partial ownership of AMP and into their own licence, has recently returned from a study tour in the United States conducted by State Street Global Advisers. 

He found that the growth of independent advice was outstripping that of institutions as consumers moved away from seeing financial planners as asset managers to asset strategists, a trend which was gathering pace in Australia as well. 

“Australia is not miles behind the United States, it just needs to redefine the playing fields and provide a stronger voice for independent advice,” Nagle said. 

Implemented Portfolios managing director Santi Burridge, who was also part of the tour, said the independent advice model in the United States was growing with nearly a quarter of planners not aligned with an institution. 

Burridge also stated that these advisers held 36 per cent of assets under advice in the United States, and the sector had grown by 13 per cent at the expense of banks and other advice institutions. 

He said the reason for the shift was that non-aligned planners in the United States had shifted from being asset managers to asset strategists for clients, and had moved from spending a majority of their time picking stocks and funds to spending time with clients. 

“The flow-on effect for Australia is asking planners if they are brilliant at investment management or with building strategies and client relationships,” Burridge said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

13 hours 57 minutes ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 19 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 17 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 20 hours ago