Senate inquiry into ASIC drives up workload
The Senate Committee of inquiry into the performance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is proving to be time-consuming not only for the regulator but many of the major banks and insurers.
This is because those submissions lodged with the Senate inquiry which reference matters concerning entities such as the Commonwealth Bank, NRMA Insurance or ING Direct are actually being referred to those companies for their responses.
In a number of instances, the matters raised with the Senate inquiry have already been handled by either ASIC itself or the Financial Ombudsman Service.
With the Prime Minister, Tony Abbott scheduled to announce his new Cabinet today and with Parliament expected to resume in late October, the Senate committee is likely to resume its proceedings and move to public hearings before the end of the year.
The Senate Committee of Inquiry was established following newspaper reports over ASIC's handling of the enforceable undertaking entered into by Commonwealth Financial Planning in 2010, but the process is expected to traverse a broader range of issues including the regulator's handling of matters related to the Future of Financial Advice changes.
The inquiry is also expected to traverse ASIC's handling of the collapse of Storm Financial and Trio/Astarra.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
