Secret trade deal slammed
A secret international trade deal, allegedly being crusaded between the Abbott Government, would have catastrophic consequences for local financial services sector, sparking job losses and an influx of foreign labour, according the union.
The remarks follow reports of trade negotiations between Australia, the US, the EU and Japan, revealed in a Wikileaks document, which would see the removal of current restrictions to foreign financial service institution operation in Australia.
According to the document, the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) would give other signing countries the right to set-up and expand within the member country’s territories “through the acquisition of existing enterprises (and without the imposition of numerical restrictions)”.
It would also facilitate the sharing of personal financial data between the signing countries, documents show.
The Financial Sector Union condemned the report and accused the Government of placing needs of industry before the local labour force and consumers.
“In what appears to be a case of collective amnesia, we now we have a government willing to capitulate to the demands of our big banks and financial services lobbyists at the expense of jobs, data security and the best interests of customers,” FSU National Secretary Leon Carter said.
“The danger of leaving the banking and finance industry to its own devices without any form of public accountability and regulation is the exposure to risky behaviour and practices that can cause financial harm and devastation to members of our community and to our economy as a whole.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
