Sandhurst Trustees to be hit with class action over Wickham Securities
Sandhurst Trustees will face a class action worth $27 million after it failed in an appeal to prevent the handing over of documents that may show it failed in its obligations to investors.
The class action brought by Shine Lawyers on behalf of more than 100 investors will proceed after Sandhurst lost an appeal last week to prevent the handing over of the documents.
The appeal related to a request for paper and electronic records regarding Sandhurst's role as trustee of failed property lender Wickham Securities with the initial case first brought to the Federal Court of Australia (Queensland District Registry) in March 2013 by a husband and wife who had invested $240,000 with Wickham.
In June last year the Federal Court ruled in favour of the couple — Graeme and Marion Clarke — and directed Sandhurst to hand over the 39 documents that included trustee reports, financial statements, trust deeds and communication with the liquidators which eventually wrapped up the Wickham business.
However in July 2014 the Federal Court ruled that an appeal by Sandhurst be allowed however this was dismissed on Thursday last week with the Clarke's agreeing to be act as lead applicants in a class action against Sandhurst being brought by Shine lawyers for other investors with Wickham.
The decision to force Sandhurst to hand over the documents does not imply that Sandhurst was at fault with the appeal decision stating that the handing over of documents would allow the Clarke's and their legal advisers to ascertain whether they should obtain relief through the courts.
Brisbane-based Wickham Securities collapsed in 2013 owing $27 million to 300 investors with director Bradley Sherwin appointing PPB Advisory as voluntary administrator.
Sherwin also operated Sherwin Financial Planners and DIY Superannuation Services out of the same office as Wickham Securities.
AUTHOR
Jason Spits
Recommended for you
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
