Robo-advisers have brand handicap
The lack of recognised robo-adviser brands remain a primary handicap despite opportunities with high net worth (HNW) individuals, according to Verdict Financial.
According to a Verdict report, 52 per cent of millionaires' investable assets are managed on a discretionary mandate basis globally but the level of interest varies significantly between markets.
Verdict found that discretionary portfolio managers would experience competition from digital providers which had traditionally been conceived as appealing mostly to self-directed investors.
Verdict acting head of wealth management, Bartosz Golba, said: "Wealth managers in developed markets have started to lean towards the view that digital players no longer compete only for execution-only business".
"Indeed, in Europe many providers dubbed ‘robo-advisers' offer a discretionary investment management service. They have clear fee structures which appeal to price-sensitive clients, though the lack of a recognised brand remains their primary handicap," he said.
The report found HNW individuals in Singapore, the UK, and the US had an average of over 70 per cent of their portfolios placed in discretionary mandates, and that developed markets generally had a higher uptake of discretionary asset management than emerging economies.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
