Robo-advice as conflicted as vertical integration: AIOFP
Attempts to introduce robo-advice into the Australian market have overlooked the fact that has not worked anywhere else in the world, according to the Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP).
Peter Johnston, AIOFP executive director, said the introduction of robo-advice compared to the vertical integration model introduced by the banks.
“The greatest industry conflict over the past 30 years has been when the banks introduced the profoundly conflicted vertical integration advice model, this is a very similar concept without the human content,” Johnston said.
“It just another ‘sneaky’ strategy to only offer an in-house product to already existing clients regardless of their quality.
“It is about time academics and bureaucrats, who live in a different world to most and never given advice or seen a consumer are removed from the industry debate.”
Johnston said politicians, the Australian Securities and Investments Commissions, and consumer groups failed to recognise the advice community did not want “bad eggs” in the industry.
“This failure has resulted in inexperienced humans making naive decisions resulting in massive red tape strangulation, duplication and ridiculous uncommercial conditions that ironically consumers are indirectly paying for,” Johnston said.
“There is a minor place for robo-advice going forward in conjunction with human advisers to assist when things go wrong with markets and/or products.
“The last thing we want are a bunch of academics trying to develop a conflicted product to ‘clip’ the ticket on industry revenue.”
AUTHOR
Chris Dastoor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
