Risk of 'nonsensical' investment transactions in SMA model portfolios
Using different managers to manage separately managed account (SMA) model portfolios is resulting in some “nonsensical” investment transactions, according to Peter McVeigh, director of investment advice firm Elston Partners.
“It’s possible for a SMA client to get two opposite transactions on the same day — one buying AMP and one selling AMP [for example]," McVeigh said.
“This is because SMA model portfolios are usually offered under a traditional wrap account, and with several SMA managers under the one wrap, you are going to get different views on particular stocks.
“While the transparency of direct assets is one of their primary strengths as an investment, unless these are managed entirely from the client’s perspective, it can create problems for advisers."
McVeigh said he could not comment on what the potential impact of these investment crossovers are on SMA investor accounts, as he did not know if some SMA providers had mechanisms of preventing these.
"However, any reasonable person investing in direct equities is entitled to expect that they are not both selling and buying a stock at the same time.
"Nobody would manage their own money this way, so why would you pay a manager to do it?"
He said, by contrast, Elston Partners offers a managed discretionary account in which "this type of crossover does not occur because we are managing the whole of a client’s portfolio".
“We have an agreement with the client to manage all their funds on a discretionary basis based on their risk profile, tax structure and personal preferences, as opposed to a SMA in which clients get multiple model portfolios.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
