Risk management survey reveals areas for improvement

risk management cent chief executive global financial crisis

22 September 2010
| By Caroline Munro |

A survey of over 300 senior business people revealed a greater awareness of the importance of risk management after the global financial crisis (GFC).

The online Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) survey was conducted by the Institute of Actuaries a week before its ERM seminar held in Sydney yesterday. It showed that while more than 85 per cent of respondents, comprising senior financial services executives, actuaries and risk managers, revealed a heightened awareness of risk management, they still saw weaknesses in a number of risk management areas.

Some 60 per cent said the area of most improvement was reporting at board level, 50 per cent stated the greatest improvement was in risk governance processes and 50 per cent stated that the risk culture had changed and people were more likely to speak up about possible risks.

“It’s pleasing to see corporate Australia has responded to risk management issues raised by the GFC with improvements in reporting at board level and in risk governance processes where risk indicators are more consistently measured, stress tested and reported,” said the Institute of Actuaries chief executive, Melinda Howes.

She added, however, that there is still work to be done in various areas.

When asked what risk management areas were still most lacking at their own or clients’ companies, 49 per cent of respondents pointed the finger at comprehensive risk modelling, while 27 per cent saw the greatest lack in the seniority of risk managers. Some 25 per cent stated the area most lacking was executive remuneration that did not encourage short-term risk taking, while 68 per cent 'somewhat agreed' that proposed guidelines on executive remuneration aimed at removing incentives for short-term risk would lead to more appropriate risk taking in financial services.

When it came to the representation of actuaries within corporations, nearly 27 per cent of respondents stated there was no actuary on either their board or in their executive team. The Institute of Actuaries called for more actuaries to be employed in risk management teams or to act as chief risk officers.

About 20 per cent of respondents stated that they had an actuary on their board, nearly 30 per cent had an actuary on their executive team and 24 per cent had an actuary on their board or in the executive team.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 days 15 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 week 1 day ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

3 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

1 week ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

6 days 21 hours ago