RI's slippery slope to common ground

financial-planners/money-management/retail-investors/

8 July 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Financial planners seeking to recommend ethical or sustainable investments to clients would benefit from the provision of a commonly-agreed set of definitions describing the funds, according to the findings of a Money Management roundtable.

The roundtable, specifically focused on developments in the ethical and sustainable investment arenas, revealed the lack of common descriptors was serving to confuse investors and, in some cases, confuse financial planners.

The situation was highlighted by the president of the Responsible Investment Association of Australia (RIAA), Duncan Paterson, who said the absence of commonly agreed definitions made it difficult for

planners to communicate with their clients.

Paterson said that when people first looked at responsible investment “they immediately come out and insist that someone provide them with a single answer as to what is a company that should be considered ‘sustainable’ or what is a company which should be considered ‘ethical’”.

“That sort of standard of answer is not asked of other aspects of the finance sector,” he said.

“So what we’re trying to do is encourage people to look into the methodologies, to understand what the implications are of different types of calls on sustainability for companies and being able to be transparent about that,” Paterson said.

He said planners could then communicate more clearly with their clients.

Perpetual’s Pablo Berrutti said he believed there was a need to define the types of methodologies that were used more tightly so that they could be more easily explained to retail investors.

“And [the methodology] doesn’t need to focus on the values or the sustainability, but simply from a methodology point of view, does the fund exclude companies because of their practices, yes or no?” he said.

“That’s a very simple and easy way to start telling funds apart,” Berrutti said.

Queensland University academic Darren Lee said that better common definitions were needed in circumstances where there was often too much confusion about what was ‘ethical’ and what was ‘sustainable’.

“If you educate in the beginning and make [the definitions] available as to what these products are, and what the implications are of these products, I see no reason why they can’t be effectively communicated,” he said.

Paterson said that while the RIAA was looking at addressing the problem, finding a set of common definitions was not as easy as it sounded in circumstances where the fund managers themselves often disagreed on their approaches.

He said that, in many respects, it depended on the audience.

A special lift-out in this week's edition of Money Management takes an in-depth look at the issues confronting the responsible investment sector.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

1 week ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND