Ripoll changes will increase client litigation
If the recommendations of the Ripoll Inquiry are adopted it will become easier for clients to make claims against their advisers, according to corporate lawyer Peter Townsend.
He added that at the moment clients can only instigate litigation if they believe the advice they have received is unsatisfactory — that is, if an inappropriate product has been recommended, if the adviser has been incompetent or if there has been ineffective disclosure.
Townsend said that while it is currently difficult for clients to make claims against their advisers, the Ripoll proposals will place the burden of proof squarely upon advisers.
Townsend warned that if the Government adopts the changes, dealer groups will have to ensure that the client’s expectations and the adviser’s remuneration are both carefully laid out in the client contract.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
