Rich prepares damages claim against Morningstar
The formermanaging director of Morningstar Australia, Graham Rich, is preparing to head back into court in order to make a multi-million dollar claim of damages over his dismissal from the research group last year.
Rich, who was dismissed by Morningstar late November after a dispute with its US parent, Morningstar Inc, will make a preliminary appearance in the Supreme Court on July 27, ahead of a final hearing on the matter towards the end of this year.
It is understood Rich will sue the five Chicago-based directors on Morningstar Australia’s board, as well as Morningstar Inc itself, for damages as well as for oppression of minority shareholding. Before his dismissal, Rich, through his company Fiduciary, owned about 40 per cent of Morningstar’s Australian business.
Last November, Rich filed an injunction in the Supreme Court in an attempt to thwart Morningstar Inc’s attempts to bring about his dismissal.
But the court ruled against Rich after Morningstar Inc. claimed that it would hold back crucial funding for the group’s Australian operations if Rich continued as managing director, potentially pushing Morningstar Australia into liquidation.
It is understood Rich will now argue that the failure of Morningstar Inc. directors to approve a similar capital injection last September, two months before Rich was dismissed, severely impeded his ability to function as managing director.
At the time of going to print,Money Managementhad not heard back from Morningstar about its latest legal entanglement with its former managing director.
Since Rich’s dismissal, Morningstar Australia has announced that it would close both its Brisbane office, founded by Rich in the early 1990s, and its Christchurch office in New Zealand.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
