Rich forces Morningstar to ‘sue itself’

3 August 2005
| By George Liondis |

The long-running dispute between Morningstar and its former Australian managing director Graham Rich has taken an unusual twist, with Rich putting the local arm of the global research firm in the extraordinary position of suing its US-based parent.

In an unlikely turn of events, Rich has been granted the right by the Supreme Court of NSW to incorporate a claim by the Australian subsidiary, Morningstar Research, within his own claim against the US-parent, Morningstar Inc.

Rich is claiming that, because he is a significant shareholder in the Australian business, and the business suffered as a result of the actions of the US parent, he has a right to include a claim by the local subsidiary in his case against the global research house.

“I believe that Morningstar Research has suffered substantial loss and damage as a result of the conduct of Morningstar Inc and some of its directors complained of in these proceedings,” Rich said in a statement.

“These proceedings seek to recover such damages. This is important because I remain a substantial, albeit disenfranchised shareholder.”

Rich has previously claimed he is entitled to 35 per cent of the shares in Morningstar Research in Australia — a point that is connected to the ongoing legal proceedings between the two parties.

The dispute dates back to 2001, when Rich was dismissed from the group in controversial circumstances. He subsequently made a multi-million dollar claim of damages against the research house.

He is alleging, among other things, that Morningstar Inc engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct.

Bevin Desmond, the president of Morningstar’s international business, said she was “disappointed” at the latest development in the case, but that the group was “confident that there is no basis for the damages claim and will strenuously defend the proceedings”.

“Morningstar Inc is disappointed that this has occurred, in circumstances where it has continually funded the Australian company since 1999, but accepts that the Court had no real option but to allow the statute-based claim to proceed,” she said.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 days 3 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 week ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

3 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

6 days 7 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

5 days 10 hours ago