Retail fees anomaly
Retail investors are paying too much in fees with respect to Australian income funds, according to a new analysis released by ratings house Morningstar this week.
The analysis flowed from a sector wrap-up and said, looking across the fees for Australian income funds, retail investors were overpaying in comparison with their wholesale counterparts.
Morningstar said a number of strategies it had assessed in its review were charging equity-like fees for an asset class that would have lower long-term returns.
“The average annual fee for wholesale fixed interest funds is 0.68 per cent while for retail funds it more than doubles that at 1.45 per cent,” the analysis said. “Given the returns generated in this asset class, we think retail investors are getting a poor deal.”
It said that another issue was the level of risk taken on by retail investors over their wholesale counterparts.
“When we looked at the offerings for retail investors, we found most shops pushing higher-risk, higher-yielding strategies,” the analysis said.
It said that the shops claimed investors were searching for a higher-yielding product, but many investors arguably did not realise the level of risk they were taking on.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
