Restrictions for licensees in intermediary authorisation agreements

the fold the fold legal AFSL afs licensee

1 July 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Australian financial services (AFS) licensees with an agreement with an unlicensed product provider cannot deal in a financial product unless they are issuing, varying, or disposing for the product issuer, according to The Fold Legal.

In an analysis the firm’s solicitor director, Jamie Lumsden, said such an agreement would give an “intermediary authorisation” for a product issuer to provide products to retail clients without an AFS licence.

However, under the intermediary authorisation a product issuer cannot deal directly with customers under any circumstance, Lumsden said.

The analysis said: “The AFS licensee cannot deal in a financial product unless they’re issuing, varying or disposing for the product issuer. This means you can’t:

  • Make a market for the financial product;
  • Operate a registered scheme;
  • Provide a custodial or depository service; or
  • Provide a crowd-funding service.

This means the exemption can never be used by:

  • The trustee of a registered scheme (including peer-to-peer lenders);
  • The trustee of an unregistered scheme that has the custodial and depository services authorisation. In this arrangement, the only option available to the trustee is to hold its own AFS licence. But it can be used by the trustee of an unregistered scheme that does not hold any financial products in custody, like a property scheme which only holds real property, provided the trustee only deals with investors through the licensee; and
  • Non-cash payment providers that allow direct access to their services”.

Lumsden noted the agreement would only be valid if the arrangement included a written agreement that:

  • Authorises the AFS licensee to make offers to arrange for the product issuer to issue, vary or dispose of the financial products;
  • Specifies that the product issuer will actually issue, vary or dispose of the products in accordance with any offers made by the licensee; and
  • Only involves offers made by the licensee that are covered by the authorisations on that licensee’s AFS licence.

Such arrangements could be used by insurers who entered the Australian market by granting a binding authority to an agent or non-cash payment products as long as customers did not have direct access to their services.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 9 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 13 hours ago