Restrictions for licensees in intermediary authorisation agreements
Australian financial services (AFS) licensees with an agreement with an unlicensed product provider cannot deal in a financial product unless they are issuing, varying, or disposing for the product issuer, according to The Fold Legal.
In an analysis the firm’s solicitor director, Jamie Lumsden, said such an agreement would give an “intermediary authorisation” for a product issuer to provide products to retail clients without an AFS licence.
However, under the intermediary authorisation a product issuer cannot deal directly with customers under any circumstance, Lumsden said.
The analysis said: “The AFS licensee cannot deal in a financial product unless they’re issuing, varying or disposing for the product issuer. This means you can’t:
- Make a market for the financial product;
- Operate a registered scheme;
- Provide a custodial or depository service; or
- Provide a crowd-funding service.
This means the exemption can never be used by:
- The trustee of a registered scheme (including peer-to-peer lenders);
- The trustee of an unregistered scheme that has the custodial and depository services authorisation. In this arrangement, the only option available to the trustee is to hold its own AFS licence. But it can be used by the trustee of an unregistered scheme that does not hold any financial products in custody, like a property scheme which only holds real property, provided the trustee only deals with investors through the licensee; and
- Non-cash payment providers that allow direct access to their services”.
Lumsden noted the agreement would only be valid if the arrangement included a written agreement that:
- Authorises the AFS licensee to make offers to arrange for the product issuer to issue, vary or dispose of the financial products;
- Specifies that the product issuer will actually issue, vary or dispose of the products in accordance with any offers made by the licensee; and
- Only involves offers made by the licensee that are covered by the authorisations on that licensee’s AFS licence.
Such arrangements could be used by insurers who entered the Australian market by granting a binding authority to an agent or non-cash payment products as long as customers did not have direct access to their services.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
