Reporting of other licensees excluded from breach data

breach reporting ASIC licensees

1 November 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Questions have been raised why reporting by other licensees was excluded from the regulator’s first breach publication.

In its recent report, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said the matter, which had been a controversial issue for advisers and licensees in the lead-up to the reportable situations regime implementation, was “outside the scope of ASIC’s legislative reporting obligation”.

Last year, the regulator stated a licensee must report to ASIC: “Where a licensee has reasonable grounds to believe that a reportable situation has arisen in relation to any other licensee, that licensee must report this to ASIC within 30 days.

“A copy of the report will also need to be provided to the other licensee. This does not apply if there are reasonable grounds to believe that ASIC is already aware of the reportable situation.”

However, there are questions why these statistics were then excluded from the data publication.

Brian Pollock, director of corporate governance at The Principals Community, said he would be keen to see this information included in a future release. The lack of information currently made it impossible to tell if there had been multiple reports or whether any had been made at all.

“This was a contentious issue and the industry expected a lot of pressure so it would be very insightful to see how it played out," he said.

“I would be interested to see what things they are reporting others on, how is the industry holding the profession to account, is it actually happening? You would have to report your peers and notify them that you had done so, there would be a lot of legal pressure if you got that wrong.

“Just because something is ‘beyond the scope’, that doesn’t mean the regulator can’t make a comment on it. It would put licensees on notice that people are making these reports.”

Pollock said he would also like to see more information in future releases on what went wrong in the specific breaches and how they could be rectified.

“There was a lack of examples or case studies, it was very much factual and not much advisers can use to improve their businesses.”

ASIC has been contacted for comment.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Old Fella on Tue, 2022-11-01 18:22

I reported what I suspected to be breaches by ARs of other Licensees to my then Licensee over several years. the response was always the same. Not interested. Yet, if I recall correctly, my AR Agreement required me to do just that. I'm glad of the industry.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS