Regulatory question mark hangs over FinTech
Financial technology (FinTech) startups could disrupt the regulatory order, a lawyer warns, with systemic tweaks needed to align regulation with the new, virtual environment.
The emergence of ‘robo' advice, peer to peer lending, crowd funding and Bitcoin presents exciting opportunities, but also challenges for regulators, particularly the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), according to the Fold Legal's managing director Claire Wivell Plater.
ASIC is "very interested" in how it can facilitate the shift from a predominantly manual to a virtual framework, she said.
"ASIC is aware of the need for regulation to keep pace with innovation and early indications are that it will facilitate relief from regulation to FinTech businesses where necessary in order to help make that happen."
However, she stressed FinTech companies would still be held to rigorous standards and will often have to find a way to operate under the old model.
"They need to understand what services require a licence and understand the regulatory obligations that flow from that, whether it be disclosure or other mandated conduct requirements," she said.
"Then it is a matter of mapping the process and the end client's experience; analysing and understanding where the existing law fits, meeting it as much as possible and if it's not possible, consider approaching ASIC for relief."
Recommended for you
As Insignia Financial formally completes the separation of MLC from NAB, Money Management reflects back on how the acquisition came to be and where Insignia sees MLC going forward.
The Financial Services Council has made multiple recommendations to ASIC regarding exercising its powers around AFSLs to mitigate the risk of failing companies including greater capital requirements.
Advice licensee Centrepoint Alliance has announced a service partnership with self-managed superannuation fund solution provider SuperConcepts.
The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort says it has received over 200 claims for compensation relating to personal financial advice since its inception and detailed the specific recurring issues being raised by claimants.
