Regulatory objectivity vital

financial-planners/financial-planning-association/compliance/ASIC/financial-planning/commonwealth-financial-planning/chairman/association-of-financial-advisers/financial-planning-industry/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/macquarie/financial-advisers/financial-advice/AFA/government/

5 December 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Editorial Comment

Much as a judge or magistrate has a duty to stay impartial when hearing matters which come before their courts, so too does a Commonwealth regulator have a duty to remain objective.

Thus, the sweeping and emotive language used about financial planners by the chairman of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Greg Medcraft, in answering questions at the National Press Club last week was inappropriate and arguably raises questions about the regulator's ability to be seen as fair and objective.

Medcraft's seemingly emotive response to questions asked about financial planners is explicable in the context of a year during which much attention was focused on the enforceable undertakings imposed on Commonwealth Financial Planning and Macquarie, but seemed to ignore the manner in which those events were leveraged by the political forces who mounted the campaign against the Government's Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.

Further, intentionally or not, his comments served to tarnish the reputations of many highly ethical and hard-working financial planners while diminishing the achievements of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) in seeking to lift standards and rid the sector of bad apples.

Mr Medcraft is not a career public servant. If he were, he would likely have stuck to a carefully-prepared script and tempered any comments capable of giving rise to perceptions of bias.

The ASIC chairman is entitled to his personal views about the financial planning industry, but his comments at the National Press Club would be seen by many as having not only unfairly tarnished an entire profession but as having diminished his own office.

- Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 2 weeks ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

3 days 4 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5