Regulatory costs likely to go up: AFA
Despite the removal of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA), the loss of funding from the big institutions is still going to need to be picked up by those that remain in the industry.
FASEA’s funding was due to run out at the end of the 2020/21 financial year.
Phil Anderson, AFA general manager – policy and professionalism, said even though the disciplinary activity would be transferred to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) Financial Services and Credit Panel, it worked on a cost/recovery basis.
“The costs that are charged by ASIC are going to go up, not down, and we’ve got all sorts of other issues that we’ve been talking to the Government about with respect to the ASIC funding levy for 2019-20,” Anderson said.
“Given the seemingly significant increase in the spend they’ve had on enforcement activity, I don’t see this as being positive in terms of costs being charged to advisers, I think that’s only going to go up.
“Because ASIC works on a cost recovery basis, the single disciplinary body that’s housed within ASIC as part of the Financial Services and Credit Panel will be on a cost recovery basis.”
However, Anderson said Treasury was not run on a cost recovery basis, so that part could result in a reduction.
“Overall, the single disciplinary body will be doing things that weren’t being done in the past,” Anderson said.
“And we only need to go back to the previous model which was the code monitoring bodies that were part of the regime until the single disciplinary body recommendation came along, then in October 2019 the government decided not to go ahead with code monitoring bodies and to go ahead with the single disciplinary body solution – that was going to cost advisers.
“So that sort of activity will now be picked up by the single disciplinary body so there is additional costs that will flow through.”
AUTHOR
Chris Dastoor
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
