Regulatory changes unlikely to stop deliberate fraud
One of Australia's most senior financial services regulators has acknowledged that the money lost in the Trio/Astarra collapse had been gone for a long time before the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) acted with finality on the issue.
APRA's deputy chairman Ross Jones has told a Senate estimates committee that with hindsight "I think the money had been gone for a very long time".
Jones was responding to questioning from Opposition senators who suggested they needed clarity around what, precisely, happened with respect to Trio/Astarra in the context of the Government's current changes with respect to Stronger Super and the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA).
Jones said that if people were deliberately establishing arrangements to facilitate fraud then it was very difficult to catch.
Referring to the Parliament's consideration of the FOFA changes, the Opposition spokesman on financial services, Senator Mathias Cormann said he was trying to get a sense as to whether, if somebody with deliberate intent to defraud were to go down the same path again, the system was better equipped to deal with the issue.
"We are having discussions on things like forcing people to resign contracts with their financial advisers, which is quite low level compared to the sorts of things that we are talking about here, where hundreds of millions of dollars are put into hedge funds overseas…with the deliberate intent to defraud," Cormann said.
"It seems to me, and I am not being critical, in the way the circumstances developed there was very little on the face of it that regulators were able to do to intervene at an appropriate time to take corrective action," he told the APRA deputy chairman.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
