Regulators warned of compliance over-kill

australian prudential regulation authority compliance disclosure financial services sector australian securities and investments commission financial services reform federal government superannuation industry

5 August 2004
| By Ross Kelly |

By Ross Kelly

THE Federal Government’s top finance industry advisory group — the Financial Sector Advisory Council (FSAC) — is calling on Australia to resist excessive regulation of the financial services sector, while strongly criticising the overlapping consumer protection roles of regulators.

In a report released by the Federal Treasurer, Peter Costello, last week, FSAC claims unnecessary regulatory legislation will hamper business investment opportunities both in Australia and overseas.

The report also calls for an adherence to principle-based rather than rule-based regulation, stating this will result in a relatively simpler and less costly regulatory framework.

While the report rarely mentions any specific legislation, its concerns echo industry complaints about the compliance burden imposed by the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA).

The report also states that the overlapping consumer protection roles between the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and between ASIC and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) are a source of confusion in the industry.

“Recent regulatory changes, while underlining the primary roles of ASIC for consumer protection in the financial system, may have led to the roles of the other agencies becoming superseded to some extent.

“This issue requires further clarification,” the report states.

Other recommendations put forward in the report include a call for further reform in the superannuation industry.

“Superannuation, particularly, requires attention to reduce the opaqueness of the industry through enhanced disclosure and education.

“Some industry sectors, particularly superannuation, remain relatively high cost.

“Removing a number of remaining structural impediments, such as portability rules and lack of fund choice can be expected to encourage further rationalisation and efficiency,” the report says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS