Regulators generally against paying for advice
Regulators feel that investors should not pay for advice and should be in an index fund, according to chief executive of Franklin Templeton Investments Greg Johnson.
Johnson said that regulators believe that adviser service fees should not come out of investment returns, but he feels those returns wouldn’t exist without them.
He questioned the regulator’s focus on financial adviser service fees, saying that it was advisers who saved people money when the global financial crisis caused investor panic.
“How many phone calls do you think happened at that market low during that period, when clients’ attitudes were ‘I’ve got to get out, I’ve got to get out of everything’?” he asked. “What would happen if there wasn’t a person to go to with that call who could say, ‘Settle down, we’re in this for the long-term’?”
Johnson feels that that an adviser service fee is a small price to pay in light of what happened, and yet most regulators are questioning the benefit of advice.
“Many regulators’ view of the world is that you shouldn’t pay for advice and you should be in an index fund — they think anything else is a lack of disclosure. That’s a pretty extreme view,” he said.
Recommended for you
AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity.
Financial advisers will have to pay around $10.4 million of the impending $47.3 million CSLR special levy but Treasury has expanded the remit to also include super fund trustees and other retail-facing sub-sectors.
While social media can have positive financial influence, the overwhelming risks signal a greater need for affordable advice as Australians continue to seek financial education on social media.
Fitzpatricks Advice Partners has released a guide on building a national advice firm with the argument that these firms are crucial to facilitating growth in the struggling profession.
