Regulation delaying speed of super fund advice: Boal

Stephen Jones Deloitte andrew boal financial advice

31 October 2024
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

Deloitte’s Andrew Boal believes digital advice delivered by superannuation funds is years away yet and will be hindered by the regulatory differences between financial advice and financial product advice. 

Boal, who is partner-actuarial consulting at Deloitte, said super funds offering advice won’t be the solution to the financial advice accessibility problem in the short term. 

Under the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) legislation, Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones is pushing for super funds to provide advice to their members as a way to close the advice gap. This includes a new class of adviser called “qualified adviser”, who will have a lower barrier to entry than full financial advisers.

Last month, Cbus announced it will offer a financial advice offering for members and their partners called Advice Essentials Plus. This will charge members and their spouse $990 to access “internal financial experts”.

In an analysis article with his colleague Neil Brown, national investment and wealth management leader, the pair wrote about the ability and viability of super funds to successfully build a hybrid advice model. 

“One problem is that for super funds to provide financial advice at scale, they will need to introduce a hybrid model where advice is delivered digitally as well as in-person. However, building these digitised financial advice businesses will take years and require substantial investment in digital technology and GenAI capabilities. 

“This will be difficult for super funds to do at speed while also balancing industry consolidation, increasing competition, and ongoing political and regulatory pressures to keep fees low. 

“To truly close the advice gap, more needs to be done to bring down regulatory barriers overall. For example, we believe there is an important distinction between financial advice and financial product advice, and this difference should be acknowledged within the regulatory framework, taking into account the likelihood and severity of any potential consumer harm.”

The pair also questioned current anti-hawking provisions and how super funds will be able to engage with members without considering the merits of their own retirement product. 

Finally, they felt the provision of limited advice to address occasional needs, which will help with consumers’ financial knowledge, build trust and foster stronger relationships. 
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 3 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 7 hours ago