Regulation delaying speed of super fund advice: Boal

31 October 2024
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Deloitte’s Andrew Boal believes digital advice delivered by superannuation funds is years away yet and will be hindered by the regulatory differences between financial advice and financial product advice. 

Boal, who is partner-actuarial consulting at Deloitte, said super funds offering advice won’t be the solution to the financial advice accessibility problem in the short term. 

Under the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) legislation, Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones is pushing for super funds to provide advice to their members as a way to close the advice gap. This includes a new class of adviser called “qualified adviser”, who will have a lower barrier to entry than full financial advisers.

Last month, Cbus announced it will offer a financial advice offering for members and their partners called Advice Essentials Plus. This will charge members and their spouse $990 to access “internal financial experts”.

In an analysis article with his colleague Neil Brown, national investment and wealth management leader, the pair wrote about the ability and viability of super funds to successfully build a hybrid advice model. 

“One problem is that for super funds to provide financial advice at scale, they will need to introduce a hybrid model where advice is delivered digitally as well as in-person. However, building these digitised financial advice businesses will take years and require substantial investment in digital technology and GenAI capabilities. 

“This will be difficult for super funds to do at speed while also balancing industry consolidation, increasing competition, and ongoing political and regulatory pressures to keep fees low. 

“To truly close the advice gap, more needs to be done to bring down regulatory barriers overall. For example, we believe there is an important distinction between financial advice and financial product advice, and this difference should be acknowledged within the regulatory framework, taking into account the likelihood and severity of any potential consumer harm.”

The pair also questioned current anti-hawking provisions and how super funds will be able to engage with members without considering the merits of their own retirement product. 

Finally, they felt the provision of limited advice to address occasional needs, which will help with consumers’ financial knowledge, build trust and foster stronger relationships. 
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

2 weeks 6 days ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

2 weeks 3 days ago