Reassuring clients on geopolitical risks
It is crucial to distinguish between short-term events and long-term shifts when it comes to assessing geopolitical risk, according to a panel.
Speaking at the Institute of Managed Account Professionals (IMAP) Independent Thought conference in Melbourne, the panel discussed the implication of geopolitical risk on asset allocation.
Chris Carrodus, senior asset consultant at Evidentia, said: “There are geopolitical events which are short-term and isolated such as cyberattacks and local elections and then there are geopolitical shifts which are long-term trends. We are more interested in the shifts.
“A shift we are seeing, which we have been seeing since before the pandemic, is around trade tensions between the US and China. It will be a slow-moving thematic shift.
“Even recently, you have seen a further crackdown on technology sharing between the US and China as an example of that and these themes are becoming a little bit more predictable.”
Matthew Swieconek, head of investment relations at Findex, said the firm had seen more clients raising geopolitics as a concern for them as they were worried by coverage of events such as the Russia/Ukraine war.
“We’ve got 130 advisers around the country and they are fielding these questions everyday because they see all sorts of press and have concerns as a consequence.
“We have tried to keep it very simple by saying that yes, the catalyst is different this time but it was also different during COVID-19 and during the Global Financial Crisis. The catalyst is different each time.
“This time it is different because we have had fixed income and equities fall in tandem which is unusual but we’ve been through these things many times before and the outcome is typically the same.”
David Berthon-Jones, joint chief investment officer at Aequitas Investment Partners, said it was important in light of this that investors spread their diversification “far and wide”.
“That’s the tagline we are telling our clients, spread capital far and wide across geographies, across styles, across sectors to make sure there are no ‘hero trades’ in the portfolio.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
