Putnam encourages K.I.S.S. strategy

mortgage/fixed-interest/bonds/retail-investors/institutional-investors/financial-services-companies/

15 November 2007
| By Sara Rich |
image
image
expand image

Charles Wall

Retail investors should be avoiding fixed interest investments that are complex and leveraged, Putnam Investments Australia senior vice-president Charles Wall warns.

“Complexity and leverage are dangerous things for a retail investor,” Wall said.

“The message investors must understand with fixed interest is keep it simple.”

Wall said complexity was brought into fixed interest because managers wanted to gain some extra return above using traditional bonds.

“There has been a big sea change in fixed interest in recent years,” he said.

“It was like the change that happened to property trusts 15 years ago.”

Wall said the fixed interest sector had witnessed an explosion of derivatives, which managers were using to gain beta returns.

This added complexity to fixed interest and greater risk, especially when mortgage-backed investments were added to the melting pot.

Wall said the tightening of credit and the repricing of this debt was causing problems at a number of blue chip financial services companies.

“The securitisation of investments such as mortgages is not bad and institutional investors understood the risks and the returns,” he said.

“But people have gotten lazy and have not been looking at the underlying investments, and these products were then sold to retail investors who didn’t understand what they were getting into.”

Retail leveraged fixed interest products were not necessarily bad as long as they had the ability to withstand shocks to the financial services system, Wall said.

“The lesson from this is that if leverage is used carefully and wisely, then the risks are reduced,” he said.

“The more complex the leverage, then it is less simple for investors and the risks won’t be understood.”

Wall said sub-prime mortgages were inappropriate investments to be leveraged into retail products such as collateralised debt obligations (CDO).

He agreed some people had forgotten the difference between mortgage funds where there is always inherent risk of people defaulting and fixed interest funds with corporate and government bonds.

“The reoccurring message to retail investors is keep it simple and look at the underlying assets in the CDO before investing,” Wall said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 3 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks 2 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND