Product manufacturers should stay out of advice
Advisers should not be subject to direction from product manufacturers under the new design, distribution and product intervention powers, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
ASIC senior executive leader, Strategy Group, Greg Kirk has told the Senate Economics Legislation committee that the regulator believes that product manufacturers should not be allowed to get in the way of the professional advice process.
Under questioning from Queensland Labor Senator, Chris Ketter Kirk said ASIC’s position was that the regime was designed to address situations, particularly the design and distribution obligation, where there was not personal advice.
“On the basis that whatever you did about design and distribution, if your customers are getting professional, good-quality advice, that is an intervening event, such that they should be entitled to rely on that advice and that those advisers should not be subject to direction from the product manufacturer about what advice they should be giving or who should be included,” he said.
“We would accept that there have been problems with the quality and professional standards in the advice area,” Kirk said. “We think the solution to that is to fix the quality of personal advice rather than substitute this obligation for it. “
“If you had both obligations, the personal advice obligations and the design and distribution obligations, applying to the same transaction I think there would be some tension between them.”
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
