Pressure mounts on govt to fund office

government/insurance/chief-executive/

26 April 2001
| By Phil Macalister |

Pressure is being put on the Government to fully fund the Office of the Retirement Commissioner's office

Currently the only funding the office receives is from the Government.

When the office was originally established, the previous National government heavied the industry into providing a significant amount of the office's budget. At that stage 10 companies each provided $100,000 annually which equated to about 25 per cent of the overall budget.

However, the number of private sector funders has fallen to just four (BNZ, Tower, Royal & SunAlliance and the NZ Stock Exchange) last year, and since July 1, the office has had no private sector funding.

This has limited the amount of the work the office can do and also has provided administrative problems.

For instance, the office has had to devote resources to fundraising and managing the funders.

The office's success in promoting the need to save message is one of the reasons for declining public sector funding.

Private sector organisations say their reduced contributions are in no way a sign of dissatisfaction with the quality and impact of the office's programmes. Rather, the office's success in increasing public awareness is the equivalent of turning on the tap for funds flow. Now the private sector wants to put their individual buckets under the tap.

That is, they are investing more in marketing their own savings products and developing their own education programmes, and less in the office's generic programme.

Investment Savings and Insurance Association chief executive Vance Arkinstall says the ISI has "attempted to encourage Government to accept greater responsibility for the funding of the ORC."

"We will not know until the budget is released how successful this has been," he says. "But I wouldn't hold my breath."

Papers released under the Official Information Act show the issue is being considered. However they also show that a request for an extra $750,000 "to replace steadily declining private sector revenue" was declined as the Government had higher priorities.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 22 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo