Prescriptive regulation could kill scaled advice


Cost-effective scaled advice will only be possible if the Government gets the policy and regulatory settings right, according to ANZ general manager for advice and distribution Paul Barrett.
The introduction of an overly prescriptive fiduciary duty for financial planners could prevent the majority of Australians who have never spoken with an adviser from receiving financial advice, he said.
"[We need to] create an environment where scaled advice can be provided that is efficient, totally in the best interest of consumers, but not weighed down by unnecessary paperwork," Barrett said.
While he acknowledged a genuine intent by the Government to address issues like scalability, Barrett said such issues needed to be considered in conjunction with the fiduciary duty.
When it came to business models, Barrett said modern financial planning practices have been moving to a fee-for-service model for a long time - and would have made the change with or without the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms.
"You only have to analyse the way commissions are charged via our product systems to be able to see that, by and large, most financial advisers are now dealing on some kind of adviser-service-fee basis or flat-fee basis," he said.
While he acknowledged that FOFA may have "accelerated things", Barrett felt that the opt-in requirement was "overkill" and "not in keeping with professionalism".
"It's not a good thing that our planners are forced by regulation to have to enter into these arrangements - especially when you do have a fiduciary duty and a lot of conflicted payments have been removed," Barrett said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.