Portfolio construction needs overhaul
The traditional method of portfolio construction should be abandoned, as it has difficulty accounting for global equities, private equity and real estate, cannot handle some asset classes such as options, and is unsuitable for retirement strategies, leading portfolio strategist Randy Lert has asserted.
Lert, who is Russell Investment Group’s chief portfolio strategist, told delegates at the Portfolio Construction Forum in Sydney recently that the traditional method for choosing assets that maximise expected returns at a level of risk acceptable to the client was no longer appropriate in most cases.
“The traditional model continues to be stretched with implementation issues,” Lert said.
“Changes in the way investors thought about global investing had challenged the model.
“There has been a shift of paradigm from ‘How much do I invest outside my home market?’ to ‘How do I get the best stock portfolio irrespective of company domicile?’”
Lert warned selecting the best assets in each national market would not necessarily produce the best global portfolio, and few current products were based on true global research.
He said asset classes such as private equity and real estate were also difficult to include in the model because their volatility could not easily be assessed, as they were traded infrequently.
Assets with absolute-return oriented strategies and options were also difficult to incorporate, he said.
Another key shortcoming of the model Lert highlighted was its focus on accumulating wealth, and inability to cater for the ‘decumulation’ of assets that occurred in retirement strategies.
He suggested a better alternative for retirees was “dynamic hedging”, with the cost of a lifetime annuity modelled as the “fail safe” wealth level that has to be maintained. He said this would change the portfolio construction problem to an “asset/annuity optimisation” problem.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
