Platforms good for investors
Brett Himbury
The managing director of a major funds management organisation has given investment platforms a glowing endorsement in the wake of a debate about shelf-space fees creating significant conflicts of interest.
Tyndall managing director Brett Himbury said: “I don’t see a conflict of interest at a fund manager level. What I do see is a business that is now backed by the some of the biggest companies in Australia.”
“The big banks are standing behind these platforms and they have invested huge amounts of money and as a result have given investors a much better experience than they’ve ever gotten with a more diverse set of fund managers at a cheaper price than has ever been available,” he added.
Himbury believes the current debate surrounding platforms is very similar to the one that industry wrestled with 20 years ago when these offerings first appeared on the scene.
According to Himbury, the debate two decades ago centred on the inadequacy of the administrative element of platforms and whether or not they should be supported on these grounds.
Today the dilemma is about whether or not to support them because of perceived conflicts of interest as a result of rebates.
He cited the ability of a fund manager to adapt ethically and legally to the changing needs of its clients as a reason for fund managers to support platforms, regardless of the rebates they need to provide to be included on them.
“We might take a haircut on our fees . . . but we’re able to do that and still increase the profitability of our business and contribute to a better client outcome,” Himbury said.
Recommended for you
As the year draws to a close, a new report has explored the key trends and areas of focus for financial advisers over the last 12 months.
Assured Support explores five tips to help financial advisers embed compliance into the heart of their business, with 2025 set to see further regulatory change.
David Sipina has been sentenced to three years under an intensive correction order for his role in the unlicensed Courtenay House financial services.
As AFSLs endeavour to meet their breach reporting obligations, a legal expert has emphasised why robust documentation will prove fruitful, particularly in the face of potential regulatory investigations.
