Platforms drop deadweight funds

investment trends platforms fund managers director

23 January 2009
| By Liam Egan |

Platforms are shedding funds and even fund managers from their investment menus on the back of slowing inflows, ratings downgrades and a lack of adviser demand.

The cuts began in earnest late last year, and the outlook for 2009 is for more of the same, with annual reviews by major providers set to take place this month against the backdrop of deteriorating investment markets.

Netwealth removed 100 funds from its 280-fund investment menu in November as part of a major review of the menu, according to Netwealth director Matt Heine.

It added 70 funds in the review, making for a net loss of 30 funds, which Heine said were dropped due to “poor adviser demand, research rating downgrades and a lack of inflows”.

“The changes also took place in conjunction with adviser reviews of their own APLs as a result of what’s happening in the market,” he said.

“They are certainly not adding funds these days. They’re removing funds.”

Investment Trends analyst Andrew Knox said platform providers are currently taking funds not getting any traction with advisers or any flows off their investment menus.

Other providers have been “adding a few funds where they know they are going to get support while at the same time removing funds that aren’t getting any support at all”, he said.

“An investment option which has only two or three clients in it on a platform is a burden and a cost for a provider in terms of administering the fund and providing a daily unit price, etcetera.”

Wealthtrac head of distribution Matthew Johnson said “adjustments” had been made to the platform’s 300-fund investment menu last year, and this “included the removal of some funds”.

Wealthtrac’s investment committee is “now also very prudent in allowing new funds to come on board and in managing the internal risk of any investment funds on our menu”.

Perpetual general manager of platforms Gai Ferrington said 10 managers had been replaced on its WealthFocus platform last year, although she said this wasn’t brought about specifically due to market conditions.

“In the master fund platform space ... the cost of keeping a fund on a master fund platform is higher than on a wrap platform,” she said.

A “number of out-of-favour funds” were removed from the platform and replaced last year, in keeping with a “change to our WealthFocus platform strategy”, she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

7 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 12 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 10 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 13 hours ago