Platform requirements to shrink market

financial planners fund managers platforms fund manager money management chief executive

8 October 2009
| By Benjamin Levy |
image
image
expand image

Some fund managers have expressed concerns that new requirements for product providers are going to make it harder for small boutiques to get their products on to an investment platform.

AMP Capital Investors’ head of retail distribution, Ben Harrop, told Money Management earlier this month that the platform requirements for product providers to prove approximately $15 million in pledged demand from financial planners is going to lead to a reduction in the number of products on offer in the marketplace, and would add a hurdle to the introduction of new products.

Consequently, it would be harder for boutique fund managers to cope with the new requirements, he said.

“If you’re a very small boutique [with] no support, it will be difficult to get [your products] on to a [platform] menu, unless you can have demonstrated demand of that $15 million,” Harrop said.

Like any business, unless you can be profitable, your business is vulnerable, he added.

While there were certain platforms that already asked for proof of a certain level of demand, this was a requirement that was starting to occur across the board, Harrop said.

Jarrod Brown, chief executive of Bennelong Funds Management, said while the demand requirements would not make it harder to get its products on to a platform, it “didn’t feel right ringing around and asking for promises [of pledged demand]”.

“There’s a lot of work to justify support, and I struggle with the concept that you’ve got to work it in with the processes these platforms have,” he said.

“I don’t think financial planners want to be pinned down, I don’t think that’s fair on any party. So we respect the process and what’s intended in terms of making sure product additions to platforms are economical. It just doesn’t feel right ringing up and saying, ‘Hey, would you please promise X dollars?’,” he said.

It also lengthens the process of getting a product on to a platform, Brown added.

Managing director Denis Donahue said Solaris Investment Management was not having any trouble getting its products on to a platform.

Businesses need to invest in their distribution channels, and all distribution channels have requirements to make commercial sense of the products put into the market, he said.

“Every extra fund manager [platform] put on must be costing something, they must know what their break-even point is, and they must have just figured out whatever it is now.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 day 8 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

5 days 14 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 3 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 days 12 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

3 days 15 hours ago