Platform fees trim dividends from investors' portfolios
Platform fees that are charged by platform providers are taking too much out of advisers’ clients, and clients don’t realise how platform fees can impact on their dividend income over time, according to the director of Capel and Associates, Rick Capel.
While there is proper disclosure in terms of external platform fees, clients don’t understand whether the fees are reasonable or not. Advisers who forgo investing their clients’ money through an external platform and invest their clients’ shares directly with their own internal platform can save clients up to 80 basis points in fees, Capel said.
Capel said that in a normal market environment when an asset class does particularly well, when the profits are realised in rebalancing the portfolio, part of those profits will go towards paying platform fees. That practice was questionable in the current market turmoil.
“In this period where most of the asset classes have gone south, I question the practice of rebalancing a client’s portfolio, which may crystallise losses simply to refloat the cash account in order to pay the adviser or dealer fees.
“This rebalancing exercise creates an unethical bias, which any professional adviser should avoid because their fees have to be paid out of asset sales,” Capel said.
Portfolios should be modelled around cash flows so that clients can tell how much of their investment dividend is going towards the cost of operating the platform, he said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
