Planning practices fear breach reporting
Fear is stopping financial planning organisations from notifying the corporate regulator of breaches in their business rather than poor culture, according to legal advisory firm The Fold.
The company's managing director Claire Wivell Plater said a lot of businesses have a rule that they cannot report breaches to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) until it has been considered by either the directors or the external lawyer.
"The regulator has identified that some businesses think that if they report breaches ASIC is going to come through and shut them down. It's like dobbing themselves in," Wivell Plater said.
"It's almost like that sort of fear is indicative of poor compliance culture."
"It defeats the purpose if you don't report within that time period because failing to report a breach in that period is actually another breach."
She said her firm takes a middle-man position, where they get their clients to report breaches as fast as possible to give ASIC a preliminary indication of what action the company will take to address it.
"We find that if ASIC is already comfortable that you're working on the breach and you know what you're going to do to address it they tend to give you then the opportunity to do that," she said.
ASIC's deputy chairman Peter Kell recently warned financial planning organisations against poor culture and pushed for remuneration incentives to be based on good culture instead of sales.
It came as ASIC launched a crackdown on breach reporting and high-risk licensees, who may then face action.
Recommended for you
With AMP advisers moving to Entireti and Insignia being the subject of a private equity bidding war, how can deals be navigated to ensure minimal stress and uncertainty for staff and advisers?
There are seven key mistakes that financial advice businesses need to steer clear of in 2025 to avoid hindering their business growth and profitability, according to Adviser Ratings.
The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would affect financial advisers.
While advisers are increasingly eyeing private markets and alternative investments, two reports have underlined the lack of investor understanding that persists among both advisers and clients.