Planning practices employing tech-heads rather than experienced planners
Financial planning practices are employing ‘technologists’ rather than future financial planners as they battle to use advice software, according to one software provider.
Midwinter Financial Services general manager — strategy and technical services, Matthew Esler, said many planning practices are restricted by what he calls “incumbent and monolithic” financial planning software.
He believes this leads to the inefficient operation of some planning practices, and points to the recruitment of staff as one barometer.
Esler said the challenges advisers face in using planning software means it isn’t being used by “experienced (and older) financial advisers, but inexperienced (and younger) paraplanners and support staff”.
“Instead of employing future financial planners with the ability to understand the needs and objectives of the client, and the ability to sell that need back to the client, financial advice practices are forced to employ technologists,” Esler said.
He describes such technologists as “tech-savvy paraplanners and support staff with limited traditional financial planning ability”.
“Advisers need to ask themselves are they recruiting staff to build a business based on quality advice and relationships, or are they recruiting to mask inefficient technology,” Esler said.
He believes practices should focus on “recruiting staff with the traditional financial planning and people skills required to expand their business”.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
