Planning bodies support register but reject exam
Adviser associations would support the establishment of an adviser register but have rejected the implementation of an exam, with the latter regarded as an inadequate measure of an adviser’s competencies.
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) made the comments at the public hearings of the Senate inquiry into the performance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
FPA chief executive Mark Rantall said “a point in time exam is not the cure to the ills of industry and it would take some time for industry to get to a higher level”.
AFA chief executive Brad Fox also rejected the introduction of an exam, stating it was a technical memory test and not an adequate measure of the ability to provide practical advice.
“An exam every three years is not consistent with adult learning principles and is a memory test. We believe entry levels need to be raised and we have an old advice population and need time to move new advisers into the profession.
“We think ongoing education and competency is a better model to adopt and a written exam is not sufficient. People need to be mentored into planning role. It is not their technical ability that should be questioned but their ability to apply it to real life and people.”
Rantall said any provision of the exam would be overreach by ASIC, which did not have the resources. He said that training should be provided by the education sector and certification by professional bodies within financial services.
Both the FPA and AFA stated in response to questions from the Senate inquiry that they supported the creation of a register of financial planners and advisers that would track their movements, training and status within the industry.
Rantall added that banning advisers who had broken the law would improve the profession - and those bans should also prevent them from being able to operate in other roles within financial planning.
“If someone was banned as planner there were usually good reasons - and then to go on to manage a financial planning firm would not be appropriate.”
Recommended for you
A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rules.
Insignia Financial has experienced total quarterly net outflows of $1.8 billion as a result of client rebalancing, while its multi-asset flows halved from the prior quarter.
Prime Financial is looking to shed its “sleeping giant” reputation with larger M&A transactions going forward, having agreed to acquire research firm Lincoln Indicators.
An affiliate of Pinnacle Investment Management has expanded its reach with a London office as the fund manager seeks to grow its overseas distribution into the UK and Europe.
