Planners warned over agribusiness advice

advisers australian taxation office investments commission

8 December 2003
| By John Wilkinson |

Financialplanners advising clients over the potential returns they can expect on agribusiness investment products may find themselves in breach of Policy Statement (PS)170.

Promoters of agribusiness schemes have been getting around the problem of breaching the ruling themselves by providing advisers with calculators to work out investment return forecasts.

In light of this, legal partner with Brisbane-based law firm McMahon Clarke, Langton Clarke warns advisers may find themselves inadvertently in hot water with theAustralian Securities and Investments Commission(ASIC), given the regulator has flagged its intent to closely monitor advisers and product promoters for breaches of the standard.

“In the past, one way of providing a forecast has been for the promoter to use an agribusiness expert to verify the forecast. But the expert’s report is being challenged by ASIC querying an expert signing off on areas such as inflation,” Clarke says.

The ASIC test for providing forecasts is that they must be reasonable and objective. However, according to Clarke the promoter can give the calculator to the adviser, as they are not a retail client.

Clarke, speaking at last week’s Lonsdale agribusiness conference, says a misleading set of forecasts would enable the promoter to be prosecuted under the Corporations Act, given “ASIC is more likely to look at the promoters who provide the forecasts, as a target for prosecution”.

“The responsibility might switch to the advisers if a disgruntled investor contacts ASIC. If the promoter sends the calculator to the advisers who then gives it to the client, then that will attract ASIC’s attention,” Clarke says.

Also speaking at the conference, Australian Taxation Office national business manager product rulings Gary Hammersley warned agribusiness promoters being granted product rulings will remain difficult.

Hammersley also warned the undertakings in prospectuses must happen as described or the ruling will subsequently be withdrawn.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS