Planners wait and see on codes
New research suggests many financial advisers are far from committed to signing up to codes of conduct to obviate the need for opt-in.
Preliminary results of research undertaken by Wealth Insights has revealed up to a third of planners have decided they will likely not be signing up to a code of conduct, while a further third are undecided about the merits of doing so.
The survey results, which are regarded as very preliminary, appear to reflect a belief that the requirements embedded in the codes of conduct likely to be approved by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) are just as onerous as the two-year opt-in arrangements which are part of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.
As well, there appears to be a strong belief among some financial planners that a Coalition victory at the forthcoming Federal Election will see the removal of the opt-in provisions as a factor in the FOFA changes.
The Opposition spokesman on Financial Services and Superannuation, Senator Mathias Cormann, has listed opt-in as one of the FOFA measures which would be repealed under a Coalition Government.
Commenting on the survey findings, Premium Wealth Management chief executive Paul Harding-Davis said he believed it reflected the reality of the industry, with many planners aware of the underlying timetables and therefore choosing to take a wait-and-see approach.
"It's a very rational outcome given the timeframes," he said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
