Planners vulnerable to new credit regime

financial planners financial planning financial planning association australian securities and investments commission

25 November 2010
| By Caroline Munro |

Financial planners are at risk of being unintentionally caught out under the new credit licensing regime, according to Gold Seal Risk Management Services managing director Clair Wivell Plater.

Wivell Plater, who hosted a compliance workshop at the Financial Planning Association national conference on the Gold Coast, said a person was providing a credit service when they suggested a client apply for a loan, apply for a credit increase on an existing loan, or retain an existing loan — all of which applied to consumer credit. However, in terms of general financial advice, there is a fine line as to whether a financial planner required a licence or not.

An example she gave of peculiarities in the new licensing regime was that of financial planners requiring a credit licence to advise on investing in residential property. However, a loan for investment purposes, including a home equity loan, or to purchase commercial property, was not considered consumer credit.

Wivell Plater added that financial planners also had to be careful about the language they used in their Statements of Advice to avoid being caught under the credit legislation. For example, she said in terms of a financial plan, the adviser could ‘assume’ that the client’s existing home loan would remain in place and not require a credit licence. However, they would be providing credit advice if they ‘recommended’ that the client keep their existing home loan.

Because of such peculiarities in the law, Wivell Plater said many planners were getting a credit licence anyway to avoid penalties by unintentionally giving credit advice without a licence, which she said was not an onerous or costly process. However, she warned that there were further difficulties planners may have to face. She said in order to become a credit licence responsible manager, one was required to have Certification IV in Financial Planning (Mortgage Broking) as well as two years problem-free mortgage broking experience.

As financial planners were not mortgage brokers, this potentially caused confusion. Wivell Plater said the Australian Securities and Investments Commission clarified that all financial planner had to do was explain what debt advice was given, even if they did not give a full mortgage broking service that encompassed actually arranging a loan.

Another difficulty encountered was in getting the required confirmation from the professional indemnity insurer that the financial planning coverage included debt advice.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 5 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 5 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS