Planners should be answerable on products, says ISA

ISA industry super australia financial planning FPA FSC advice DDOs planners financial advice financial planners financial products Senate Economics Legislation Committee Senate Committee ASIC australian securities and investments commission financial planning association financial services council corporations act Royal Commission RC best interest duty

13 November 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Personal financial advice provided by financial planners should not be exempt from the Government’s new financial product design and distribution obligations (DDOs) according to major industry superannuation funds body, Industry Super Australia (ISA).

ISA has told the Senate Economics Legislation Committee that the financial planner best interest duty is not sufficient to allow them to be exempt from the design and distribution powers to be handed to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

In doing so, the ISA has directly countered the arguments put forward by both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Financial Services Council (FSC) that personal financial advice should be exempt.

Answering a question on notice from the committee, ISA said: “A successful DDO regime is philosophically designed to place shared obligations for the responsible provision of financial products on entities across the entire ‘design-distribution’ continuum.”

“By exempting personal financial advice, this continuum of responsibility is broken,” the ISA said.

It said the key justification for a personal financial advice exemption was that advisers were already covered by the best interest duty under the Corporations Act but claimed this was a mistaken perception.

“It is a mistake to assume the best interest duty would provide a similar or comparable test to a target market determination,” the ISA said. “Given the financial advice case studies before the recent Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, the limitations and problems with the Best Interest Duty have been fully exposed.”

“The argument that a DDO would create confusion with personal advice obligations is also irrelevant,” it said. “The target market determination is intended to define a class of consumers, not individual consumers.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 day ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

2 weeks 4 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

2 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS