Planners must improve communication: AFA

financial planning research and ratings afa chief executive AFA brad fox association of financial advisers chief executive director

13 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

A new Association of Financial Advisers white paper has uncovered what good financial planning practices do well - but also what they need to improve on. 

The AFA 'New Frontiers: The Age of the Consumer' white paper is based on client surveys conducted by planning practices in the last four year via Business Health's CATScan system. 

According to Business Health director Terry Bell, the survey of 12,000 clients is self-selecting in the sense that it only includes practices that want to survey their clients. In addition, the practices are encouraged by Business Health to primarily include their "A class" clients in the survey, said Bell. 

The highest ranking key performance indicator for planners in the survey was 'relationship', which scored 4.46 out of five. 'Professionalism' scored 4.39; 'staff' 4.38 and 'knowledge' 4.31. 

AFA chief executive Brad Fox said the white paper provided some evidence about what the best planning practices are doing when it comes to the client experience. 

"There's been a defensiveness about what advisers have done and how they go about doing it. It's time for us all to get on the front foot and get down to what matters most: how we put consumers at the centre of the discussion," he said. 

The lowest-scoring categories in the white paper were 'communication', 'range' (of products) and '[client] review', which scored 4.09, 4.05 and 3.95, respectively. 

The white paper listed a number of actions that practices could undertake to address the relatively poor communications score. 

Factors mentioned in the white paper include: whether or not the language used is friendly and easy to understand; the frequency of the communication; the format it is delivered in; and the tone of the communication. 

According to Bell, a part of the CATScan survey that was not included in the white paper was the "freeform feedback" provided by clients. 

The predominant gripe in the feedback was a lack of communication when there were changes in a practice's business. 

"It could be staff person going, a change of office, a change of name or change or product manufacturer. If change has happened and the practice hasn't communicated it properly, clients get very nervous," Bell said. 

"You can either communicate the change positively, or you can do nothing and let it slip - and all of a sudden there's a black mark against your name," he said. 

According to Bell, the communication and the client review are also the lowest scoring attributes when Business Health conducts its survey overseas in places like Hong Kong and America. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 1 day ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 12 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

2 days 3 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

1 day 7 hours ago